Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Semaglutide and Cardiac Remodeling in Obesity-Related HFpEF

PICO
PICO

Clinical Bottom Line

An echocardiography substudy of the STEP-HFpEF Program found once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg attenuated left atrial and right ventricular remodeling versus placebo over 52 weeks. PICO summary and expert commentary.

Summary: In a prespecified echocardiography substudy of the STEP-HFpEF Program (491 of 1,145 participants, 43%), once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo over 52 weeks attenuated left atrial remodeling (estimated mean difference in LA volume -6.13 mL; 95% CI -9.85 to -2.41; P=0.0013) and right ventricular enlargement, with modest diastolic improvements. No effect was seen on left ventricular mass or systolic function. These are imaging surrogate outcomes, not clinical endpoints.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population491 of 1,145 adults (43%) with obesity-related HFpEF (LVEF =45%, BMI =30) enrolled in the pooled STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials; prespecified echocardiography substudy; multinational, double-blind RCT.
InterventionOnce-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg for 52 weeks (n=253).
ComparisonMatching placebo for 52 weeks (n=238).
OutcomePrimary substudy outcome (change in LA volume): EMD -6.13 mL; 95% CI -9.85 to -2.41; P=0.0013. RV end-diastolic area: EMD -1.99 cm2; 95% CI -3.60 to -0.38; P=0.016. RV end-systolic area: EMD -1.41 cm2; 95% CI -2.42 to -0.40; P=0.0064. E-wave velocity: EMD -5.63 cm/s; 95% CI -9.42 to -1.84; P=0.0037. E/A ratio: EMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.24 to -0.04; P=0.0075. E/e’ average: EMD -0.79; 95% CI -1.60 to 0.01; P=0.05 (borderline, CI crosses null). No significant effect on LV dimensions, mass, or systolic function. No ARR/NNT reported (imaging substudy, not event-driven).
RCT J Am Coll Cardiol · 2024

Semaglutide and cardiac remodeling in obesity-related HFpEF

RCT echo substudy · obesity-related HFpEF · 52 weeks

Trial design
Obesity-related HFpEF Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED 1:1 Semaglutide Semaglutide 2.4 mg SC n = 253 Placebo Matching placebo n = 238 Change in echo measures of cardiac remodeling (mean difference vs placebo)
Between-group effect (95% CI)
0 (no difference) -10 2 LA volume (mL)-6.13 ✓RV end-diastolic area (cm2)-1.99 ✓RV end-systolic area (cm2)-1.41 ✓ Mean difference vs placebo (favours semaglutide <- | -> favours placebo) · ✓ = significant
LA volume
-6.13 mL
95% CI -9.85 to -2.41
RV end-diastolic area
-1.99 cm2
95% CI -3.60 to -0.38
RV end-systolic area
-1.41 cm2
95% CI -2.42 to -0.40
E/e' average
-0.79
95% CI -1.60 to 0.01 (NS)
⬡ Bottom Line

Over 52 weeks, semaglutide attenuated left atrial and right ventricular remodeling versus placebo. These are imaging surrogate outcomes, not clinical endpoints.

Expert Commentary

This prespecified echocardiography substudy of the STEP-HFpEF Program offers a mechanistic complement to the clinical benefits already reported for semaglutide in obesity-related HFpEF. The verdict is that semaglutide was associated with measurable attenuation of adverse left atrial and right ventricular remodeling and modest improvement in diastolic indices, with the primary substudy outcome of left atrial volume met convincingly. These signals are biologically coherent and lend plausibility to the symptomatic gains seen in the parent trials. The principal limitation is that imaging was available in only 43% of randomised participants, so the substudy is best read as hypothesis-supporting rather than definitive, and the endpoints are surrogate measures rather than hospitalisations or mortality. The E/e’ average was only borderline (P=0.05, confidence interval touching the null), and left ventricular mass and systolic function were unchanged, which tempers any claim of broad structural reversal. The trials were manufacturer-sponsored, with sponsor employees among the authors, so independent replication is reassuring to await. Can I use this with my patients? Yes, as supportive context when discussing why semaglutide may help a patient with obesity-related HFpEF, while being candid that this analysis measures cardiac structure on echocardiography, not outcomes that patients feel directly. Clinicians should anchor decisions to the symptomatic and weight endpoints of the main trials and treat these remodeling data as encouraging corroboration.

References

Solomon SD, Ostrominski JW, Wang X, et al. Effect of semaglutide on cardiac structure and function in patients with obesity-related heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84(17):1587-1602. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.021

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.