Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Semaglutide and Cardiac Remodelling in Obesity-Related HFpEF

PICO
PICO

Clinical Bottom Line

An echocardiography substudy of the STEP-HFpEF Program found that once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg attenuated left atrial and right ventricular remodelling versus placebo, without changing left ventricular systolic function. PICO summary and expert commentary.

Summary: In a prespecified echocardiography substudy of the double-blind STEP-HFpEF Program (n=491 of 1,145), once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg attenuated left atrial volume remodelling versus placebo over 52 weeks (estimated mean difference -6.13 mL; 95% CI -9.85 to -2.41; P=0.0013), with smaller right ventricular dimensions and modest diastolic improvements but no change in left ventricular systolic function.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population491 of 1,145 adults (43%) with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF >=45%, BMI >=30) who had paired echocardiograms at randomisation and 52 weeks, pooled from the international, multicentre, double-blind STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised controlled trials.
InterventionOnce-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg for 52 weeks (n=253).
ComparisonMatching placebo for 52 weeks (n=238).
OutcomePrespecified primary outcome, change in left atrial (LA) volume: estimated mean difference (EMD) -6.13 mL (95% CI -9.85 to -2.41; P=0.0013) favouring semaglutide. Secondary echocardiographic outcomes (not adjusted for multiplicity): RV end-diastolic area EMD -1.99 cm (95% CI -3.60 to -0.38; P=0.016); RV end-systolic area EMD -1.41 cm (95% CI -2.42 to -0.40; P=0.0064); E-wave velocity EMD -5.63 cm/s (95% CI -9.42 to -1.84; P=0.0037); E/A ratio EMD -0.14 (95% CI -0.24 to -0.04; P=0.0075); E/e’ average EMD -0.79 (95% CI -1.60 to 0.01; P=0.05). No significant effect on left ventricular dimensions, mass, or systolic function. Greater weight loss was associated with greater LA volume reduction (P=0.033). Effects were not modified by diabetes or atrial fibrillation status. No ARR or NNT applicable (continuous imaging endpoints).
RCT J Am Coll Cardiol · 2024

Semaglutide & Cardiac Remodelling in HFpEF

Echo substudy · RCT · obesity HFpEF · 52 weeks

Trial design
Obesity-related HFpEF Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED 1:1 Semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly SC n = 253 Placebo Matching placebo n = 238 Change in LA volume (mL)
Between-group effect (95% CI)
0 (no difference) -12 2 LA volume change (mL)-6.13 ✓ mL, mean difference vs placebo · ✓ = significant
LA volume
-6.13 mL
95% CI -9.85, -2.41
RV end-diastolic area
-1.99 cm²
P=0.016
E/A ratio
-0.14
P=0.0075
LV systolic function
No change
EF preserved
⬡ Bottom Line

Semaglutide attenuated left atrial remodelling versus placebo over 52 weeks, with smaller right ventricular dimensions and modest diastolic gains but no change in LV systolic function. Secondary echo signals are exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

Expert Commentary

This echocardiography substudy strengthens the mechanistic case that semaglutide is more than a symptom modifier in obesity-related HFpEF. The prespecified primary outcome was met: left atrial remodelling, a marker tightly linked to filling pressures and prognosis in this phenotype, was attenuated by roughly six millilitres against placebo within a double-blind randomised framework. Reductions in right ventricular dimensions and the diastolic indices point in a consistent direction, and the weight-loss correlation with left atrial volume offers a plausible pathway. The verdict is cautiously positive but qualified. The principal limitation is that only 43% of the parent cohort contributed paired imaging, and every secondary echocardiographic outcome was exploratory and unadjusted for multiple comparisons, so the diastolic and right ventricular signals should be read as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmed. The trial was funded by the manufacturer, with sponsor employees among the authors, and although the parent design was double-blind, imaging substudies remain vulnerable to differential follow-up. Effect sizes here are modest, not implausibly large. Can I use this with my patients? Yes, as supportive context when counselling a patient with obesity-related HFpEF who is already a candidate for semaglutide on symptom and weight grounds, but not as a standalone reason to start therapy. One would wish to see whether these structural changes translate into hard event reduction before treating reverse remodelling as the goal.

References

Solomon SD, Ostrominski JW, Wang X, Shah SJ, Borlaug BA, Butler J, et al. Effect of semaglutide on cardiac structure and function in patients with obesity-related heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84(17):1587-1602. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.021

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.