Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Can Vitamin D Improve Insulin Function in Women with Prediabetes?

Hormone Insight visual abstract summarising vitamin D supplementation in women with prediabetes.
Visual abstract for vitamin D in prediabetes: insulin indices improved but fasting glucose did not change.

Clinical Bottom Line

A double-blind RCT finds vitamin D improves insulin secretion and HOMA-IR but not fasting glucose in women with prediabetes. PICO summary and clinical expert commentary.

Summary: In women aged 18–65 with prediabetes, vitamin D 50,000 IU every two weeks for 12 weeks improved insulin secretion and HOMA-IR but did not change fasting glucose, lipids, anthropometry, or omentin-1 compared with placebo.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
PopulationWomen aged 18–65 with prediabetes (n=96; 48 per arm).
InterventionVitamin D 50,000 IU every two weeks for 12 weeks.
ComparisonMatching placebo on an identical schedule.
OutcomeSignificant rise in 25(OH)D, insulin (MD 0.413 µIU/mL), HOMA-IR (MD 0.411) and HOMA-β (MD 29.5%). No significant change in fasting glucose, lipid profile, omentin-1, or anthropometric indices.
RCT Nutr Diabetes · 2025

Vitamin D in prediabetes

RCT · women with prediabetes · 12 weeks

Trial design
Women 18–65, prediabetes Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED 1:1 Vitamin D 50,000 IU/2 weeks n = 48 Placebo Matching placebo n = 48 Insulin and HOMA indices vs placebo
Between-group effect (95% CI)
0 (no difference) -0.2 0.7 Insulin (µIU/mL)+0.413 ✓HOMA-IR+0.411 ✓ Mean difference vs placebo (null = 0) · ✓ = significant
Insulin MD
+0.413
µIU/mL (p<0.05)
HOMA-IR MD
+0.411
95% CI 0.32–0.50
HOMA-β MD
+29.5%
95% CI 22–37
Fasting glucose
No change
Not significant
⬡ Bottom Line

Vitamin D raised insulin and HOMA indices but left fasting glucose, lipids, omentin-1, and anthropometry unchanged. Biochemistry moved; the clinical glucose needle did not.

Expert Commentary

Vitamin D for diabetes prevention is a question I thought the large trials had largely settled, and not in vitamin D’s favour, so I came to this study expecting little and found a familiar pattern. The biochemistry moved, the clinical needle did not. Insulin and HOMA indices improved, which is mechanistically plausible given vitamin D receptors on beta cells, but fasting glucose, the thing I actually track in a prediabetic woman, did not budge. That disconnect is the whole story, and it echoes the much larger D2d trial, where supplementation failed to prevent progression to diabetes except perhaps in those who started deficient. The limitation that matters most here is that baseline vitamin D status was not reported, so I cannot tell whether I am looking at genuine repletion of deficient women or supplementation of replete ones, and that distinction is everything. Can I use this with my patients? Only in the way I already do: correct documented deficiency because it is worth doing on its own merits, but never sell vitamin D as a diabetes-prevention strategy in place of weight loss, activity, or metformin. I would need hard progression data, not HOMA shifts, to change that stance.

References

Molani-Gol R, Rafraf M, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Aftabi-Yousefabad S. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on metabolic factors, serum omentin-1, and anthropometric indices in middle-aged women with prediabetes: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Nutr Diabetes. 2025;15(1):44. doi:10.1038/s41387-025-00402-w

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.