Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Amycretin for Weight Loss: Phase 1b/2a Safety and Early Weight Data

Hormone Insight visual abstract summarising amycretin for weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity.

Clinical Bottom Line

An early-phase trial reports large but exploratory weight-loss signals for subcutaneous amycretin in overweight and obesity, with safety as the primary focus. PICO summary and expert commentary.

Summary: In adults aged 18 to 55 years with overweight or obesity, this phase 1b/2a, placebo-controlled trial (n=125; amycretin n=101, placebo n=24) was designed primarily to assess the safety and tolerability of once-weekly subcutaneous amycretin, a unimolecular GLP-1 and amylin receptor agonist. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal events. Bodyweight change, a secondary endpoint, favoured amycretin across doses, reaching a mean of minus 24.3 percent versus minus 1.1 percent for placebo at the 60 mg maintenance dose by week 36 (p<0.0001).

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population125 adults aged 18 to 55 years with overweight or obesity (BMI 27.0 to 39.9 kg/m2); randomised, double-blind, single-centre study (San Antonio, USA).
InterventionOnce-weekly subcutaneous amycretin (GLP-1 and amylin receptor agonist), dose-escalated to maintenance doses of 1.25, 5, 20, or 60 mg over 20 to 36 weeks (n=101).
ComparisonMatching subcutaneous placebo over the same treatment durations (n=24).
OutcomePrimary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse events; most were mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal events. Mean bodyweight change (secondary endpoint) versus placebo: 60 mg minus 24.3 percent vs minus 1.1 percent (week 36); 20 mg minus 22.0 percent vs plus 1.9 percent (week 36); 5 mg minus 16.2 percent vs plus 2.3 percent (week 28); 1.25 mg minus 9.7 percent vs plus 2.0 percent (week 20). Between-group differences were significant (Parts A to D p<0.0001; Part E p=0.0003). Withdrawals were frequent, mostly for reasons unrelated to adverse events. No 95 percent confidence intervals, absolute risk reduction, or number needed to treat were reported for the weight outcome.
RCT Lancet · 2025

Amycretin for weight loss

Phase 1b/2a RCT · overweight/obesity · 36 weeks

Trial design
Adults, BMI 27.0-39.9 Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED ~4:1 Amycretin SC weekly, 60 mg max n = 101 Placebo Matching SC placebo n = 24 Mean bodyweight change at week 36 (60 mg arm)
Change from baseline — both arms
% bodyweight change Baseline Week 36 -24.3% vs -1.1% Amycretin Placebo
Amycretin 60 mg
-24.3%
Week 36
Placebo
-1.1%
Week 36
Difference
~23.2 pts
vs placebo
Significance
p<0.0001
Parts A-D
⬡ Bottom Line

At the 60 mg dose, amycretin cut mean bodyweight by 24.3 percent versus 1.1 percent for placebo by week 36. Weight was a secondary, exploratory endpoint in a small single-centre safety trial, so the effect needs phase 3 confirmation.

Expert Commentary

This is an early-phase study, and its purpose was to establish safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics rather than to prove efficacy. On that primary question the verdict is reassuring: the tolerability profile of once-weekly subcutaneous amycretin was consistent with what is expected of GLP-1 and amylin agonists, with gastrointestinal events predominating and most being mild to moderate. The headline weight-loss figures are striking, with mean reductions reaching roughly a quarter of bodyweight at the highest dose, but they are secondary, exploratory findings and should be read with caution. The most important limitation is the design itself: a small, single-centre study with only 24 placebo participants, substantial dropout, dose arms of differing length, and no confidence intervals reported for the weight effect, all of which inflate uncertainty around such large point estimates. The trial was funded by the manufacturer, and these magnitudes are implausibly strong for definitive interpretation at this stage. Can I use this with my patients? Not yet; amycretin is investigational and unavailable for clinical use, and these data cannot guide prescribing. The appropriate next step is adequately powered, multicentre phase 3 trials with durability and cardiometabolic outcomes before any conclusion about real-world benefit is warranted.

References

Dahl K, Toubro S, Dey S, Duque do Vale R, Flint A, Gasiorek A, et al. Amycretin, a novel, unimolecular GLP-1 and amylin receptor agonist administered subcutaneously: results from a phase 1b/2a randomised controlled study. Lancet. 2025;406(10499):149-162. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01185-7

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.