Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Can Exercise and Diet Improve Inflammation and Insulin Resistance in Men with Belly Fat?

Clinical Bottom Line

A three-arm RCT shows adding a high-protein, low-GI diet to training cuts IL-6 and hs-CRP and improves insulin sensitivity in men with abdominal obesity. PICO summary and commentary.

Summary: In men with abdominal obesity, adding a high-protein, low-glycaemic-index diet to aerobic-resistance training reduced IL-6 and hs-CRP, raised adiponectin, and improved insulin sensitivity and visceral fat more than exercise alone over a short supervised intervention.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population44 men (mean age 34.7 ± 5.5), abdominal obesity (BMI 32.0 ± 3.9, waist 110.3 ± 8.5 cm).
InterventionAerobic-resistance training plus ad libitum high-protein, low-GI diet (EDG, n=16).
ComparisonExercise only (EG, n=16) and no-intervention control (CG, n=12).
OutcomeCombined arm: IL-6 -48%, hs-CRP -30%, adiponectin +15% (p=0.02), improved FG/I (p=0.02) and Castelli II (p=0.01), with reduced visceral and total fat and increased fat-free mass (p<0.01). Larger than exercise alone.
RCT Int J Mol Sci · 2025

Diet plus exercise vs exercise alone in abdominal obesity

RCT · men with abdominal obesity · short supervised intervention

Trial design
44 men, abdominal obesity Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED EDG:EG:CG Diet + exercise Training + high-protein n = 16 Exercise only Aerobic-resistance only n = 16 Change in IL-6, hs-CRP, adiponectin, insulin sensitivity
Change from baseline — both arms
IL-6 (% of baseline) Baseline Post -48% Diet + exercise Exercise only
IL-6
-48%
combined arm
hs-CRP
-30%
p=0.04
Adiponectin
+15%
p=0.02
FG/I ratio
improved
p=0.02
⬡ Bottom Line

Adding a high-protein, low-GI diet to aerobic-resistance training cut IL-6 and hs-CRP and raised adiponectin more than exercise alone, with better body recomposition. Surrogate markers only, no hard outcomes.

Expert Commentary

That diet plus exercise beats exercise alone is hardly a surprise, and I will admit my first reaction was that this trial confirms the obvious. What earns my attention on a closer read is the cleanliness of the demonstration: a three-arm design that isolates the added value of nutrition, and an ad libitum high-protein, low-GI pattern rather than rigid calorie counting, which is far closer to what I can actually ask a patient to sustain. The body-recomposition signal, fat down and fat-free mass up, is more meaningful to me than weight alone, and the adipokine and inflammatory shifts fit a coherent mechanism. My caution is the usual one for this kind of study: small numbers, young men only, short duration, and surrogate biomarkers rather than events, so I cannot promise a patient this prevents a heart attack. Can I use this with my patients? Yes, and easily, because it sharpens advice I already give: pair resistance and aerobic training with a higher-protein, lower-GI, higher-fibre diet rather than leaning on exercise alone. I would just keep the framing honest, that this improves the metabolic profile, with hard-outcome benefit inferred from the wider evidence rather than proven here.

References

Makiel K, Targosz A, Kosowski P, Suder A. Effects of aerobic-resistance training and nutritional intervention on adiponectin, interleukin-6, and hs-CRP concentrations in men with abdominal obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(19):9500. doi:10.3390/ijms26199500

🔗 Related reading

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.