Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

N-Acetyl-Cysteine as Adjuvant Therapy Accelerates Response in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Open-Label RCT

Clinical Bottom Line

An open-label RCT finds N-acetylcysteine speeds the fall in inflammatory markers in diabetic foot osteomyelitis, though clinical outcomes were not measured. PICO summary and commentary.

Summary: In an open-label trial in diabetic foot osteomyelitis, adding oral N-acetylcysteine to standard antibiotics accelerated the fall in inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP) over three weeks, with mild gastrointestinal effects, though clinical outcomes like healing and amputation were not assessed.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population53 patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (Wagner grade III–IV); Iran.
InterventionN-acetylcysteine 600 mg effervescent tablet twice daily for 2 weeks plus standard antibiotics.
ComparisonStandard antibiotic therapy alone.
OutcomeGreater reduction in infectious markers with NAC (ESR -49.44 vs -7.17; CRP -44.43 vs -14.02; both p<0.05), with most parameters improved except lymphocyte proportion and NLR (p=0.11, 0.84). Open-label design.
RCT Arch Iran Med · 2025

NAC adjuvant therapy in diabetic foot osteomyelitis

Open-label RCT · diabetic foot osteomyelitis · 3 weeks

Trial design
53 adults, Wagner III–IV Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED 1:1 NAC + antibiotics NAC 600 mg twice daily n = 26 Antibiotics alone Standard antibiotics n = 27 Change in inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR)
Change from baseline — both arms
CRP (mg/L) Baseline Week 3 -44.43 vs -14.02 NAC + antibiotics Antibiotics alone
CRP change
-44.43
NAC arm
CRP change
-14.02
Control
ESR change
-49.44
NAC vs -7.17
Significance
p<0.05
both markers
⬡ Bottom Line

Adding NAC to antibiotics produced a faster fall in CRP and ESR over three weeks. Biomarker-only endpoints and open-label design mean healing, recurrence, and amputation remain unknown.

Expert Commentary

The rationale is appealing and biologically grounded: biofilm is a central reason diabetic foot osteomyelitis resists treatment, and N-acetylcysteine disrupts biofilm matrix and replenishes glutathione, so a faster inflammatory response when it is added to antibiotics fits the mechanism. It is also cheap, familiar, and well tolerated, which lowers the bar for trying it. But I read this as preliminary, for two honest reasons. First, the trial is open-label, and unblinded assessment of something as judgement-sensitive as response is vulnerable to bias. Second, and more importantly, the endpoints are biomarkers, ESR and CRP, not the outcomes that actually matter to a patient with infected bone: healing, recurrence, and amputation, none of which were reported. A faster fall in CRP is encouraging but is not the same as curing osteomyelitis. Can I use this with my patients? Cautiously and as an adjunct only. Given its safety and low cost, adding NAC to a proper regimen is defensible, but it must never substitute for appropriate antibiotics, debridement, offloading, vascular assessment, and glycaemic control. I would want a blinded trial with clinical endpoints before recommending it routinely.

References

Hooshmand Gharabagh L, Heydaroghli M, Esmaeili A. Efficacy of N-acetyl-cysteine as adjuvant therapy for diabetic foot osteomyelitis: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Arch Iran Med. 2025;28(5):257–263. doi:10.34172/aim.33355

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.