Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Is Aflibercept Alone or Combined with Dexamethasone Better for Diabetic Macular Edema?

Clinical Bottom Line

A small phase 2 trial finds adding dexamethasone to aflibercept improves diabetic macular edema outcomes with no IOP rise. PICO summary and expert commentary.

Summary: In a small phase 2 trial in diabetic macular edema, adding dexamethasone sodium phosphate to intravitreal aflibercept produced greater short-term reduction in macular thickness and better visual acuity than aflibercept alone, with no rise in intraocular pressure in either group.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population16 eyes of 16 participants with diabetic macular edema; phase 2 randomised trial, Brazil.
InterventionIntravitreal aflibercept 2 mg plus dexamethasone sodium phosphate 0.04 mg, repeated at 30 and 60 days.
ComparisonIntravitreal aflibercept 2 mg monotherapy.
OutcomeAt day 90, central macular thickness fell more with combination (176 vs 54 µm; p=0.034) and BCVA improved more (+0.31 vs -0.06 LogMAR; p=0.020). Intraocular pressure stable in both groups (p=0.855); none exceeded 21 mmHg or needed pressure-lowering drops. No significant adverse events.
RCT Arq Bras Oftalmol · 2025

Aflibercept + dexamethasone for diabetic macular edema

RCT · phase 2 · diabetic macular edema · 90 days

Trial design
16 eyes, DME, Brazil Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED 1:1 Combination Aflibercept + dexamethasone n = 8 Monotherapy Aflibercept 2 mg alone n = 8 Change in central macular thickness from baseline
Change from baseline — both arms
µm Baseline Day 90 -176 vs -54 µm Combination Monotherapy
CMT reduction
176 vs 54 µm
p=0.034
BCVA change
+0.31 vs -0.06
LogMAR; p=0.020
IOP
Stable
p=0.855
Ocular HTN
0 vs 0
>21 mmHg
⬡ Bottom Line

Adding soluble dexamethasone phosphate to aflibercept gave greater short-term macular thickness reduction and visual gain than aflibercept alone, with no IOP rise. Small (16 eyes), 90-day phase 2 signal needing larger confirmation.

Expert Commentary

The rationale is sound, anti-VEGF and corticosteroid hit complementary pathways in diabetic macular edema, and the soluble dexamethasone phosphate used here is a shorter-acting form than the implant, which may explain the reassuring pressure findings. I read the result as promising but preliminary, and I want to correct the earlier write-up on one point: this trial did not show a rise in intraocular pressure with the combination. Pressure was stable in both arms, nobody crossed into ocular hypertension, and no one needed pressure-lowering treatment, so the steroid-IOP caution, while true as a general principle, was not borne out in this study and should not be attributed to it. The overriding limitation is size: sixteen eyes and ninety days is a small, short phase 2 signal, and soluble dexamethasone’s brief duration means the IOP comfort may not extend to longer or repeated steroid exposure. Can I use this with my patients? Not as a directive, and this is an ophthalmology decision in any case. It is encouraging support for combination therapy in eyes responding poorly to anti-VEGF alone, but I would await a larger, longer phase 3 trial before treating it as established.

References

Neri VC, Lira RPC, Vasconcelos AAA, Jorge PHL, Lira GR, Almeida VDCL. Intravitreal aflibercept alone versus combination with dexamethasone phosphate for diabetic macular edema: a randomized phase-2 clinical trial. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2025;88(5):e20250098. doi:10.5935/0004-2749.2025-0098

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.