Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Can Printed Educational Materials Improve Self-Care in Type 2 Diabetes Patients?

Hormone Insight visual abstract summarising print-based education for self-care in type 2 diabetes.
Visual abstract for print-based education and self-care practices in type 2 diabetes.

Clinical Bottom Line

A quasi-experimental study finds print-based education improves self-care in type 2 diabetes patients in Nigeria, without measuring glycaemic outcomes. PICO summary and commentary.

Summary: In type 2 diabetes patients at tertiary hospitals in Southwest Nigeria, a 12-week print-based educational programme significantly improved self-reported self-care practices while routine care produced no change, though no glycaemic or clinical endpoints were measured.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population192 adults with type 2 diabetes at endocrinology clinics in Southwest Nigeria (quasi-experimental, 96 per arm).
Intervention12-week print-based programme: presentation sessions, take-home leaflets, and weekly reminder messages.
ComparisonRoutine care with no additional educational intervention.
OutcomeSelf-care scores rose 10.57 to 12.96 in the intervention group (z=-6.845; p<0.001); no significant change in control (z=-0.160; p=0.873). 90.4% reached good self-care practice. No clinical endpoints. No adverse effects.
RCT BMC Endocr Disord · 2025

Print-Based Education in Type 2 Diabetes

Quasi-RCT · type 2 diabetes · 12 weeks

Trial design
Adults with type 2 diabetes Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED 1:1 Print education Leaflets + reminders n = 96 Routine care No extra education n = 96 Self-care practice score
Change from baseline — both arms
score Baseline Week 12 +2.38 pts Print education Routine care
Intervention score
10.6 → 13.0
p<0.001
Control score
No change
p=0.873
Good self-care
90.4%
Intervention arm
Clinical endpoints
None measured
HbA1c/weight
⬡ Bottom Line

A 12-week printed education programme improved self-reported self-care scores versus no change with routine care. No glycaemic or clinical outcomes were measured.

Expert Commentary

There is real value in showing that something cheap and low-tech works where digital tools are impractical, and durable printed leaflets backed by reminders fit a resource-limited setting well. The behavioural signal is clear, with the intervention group improving while the control did not, which I find believable for structured, reinforced education. I temper it with the usual honesty about design and endpoints. This was quasi-experimental rather than a clean randomised trial, the outcome was self-reported self-care behaviour, which is prone to social-desirability bias after an education programme, and there is no HbA1c, weight, or complication data, so the downstream clinical benefit remains unproven, which is precisely the open question across this whole literature. Twelve weeks also says nothing about whether the habits stick. Can I use this with my patients? Yes, in principle: it supports investing in structured, culturally adapted printed education as a complement to clinical care, paired with objective monitoring rather than relied on alone. I would want a trial linking the behaviour change to glycaemic outcomes before claiming more than improved self-care scores.

References

Howells BB, Nwozichi CU, Monehin S, Ogunmuyiwa AO, Abaribe C. Assessing the effectiveness of print-based educational intervention on self-care practices among type 2 diabetes patients in selected tertiary hospitals in Southwest, Nigeria. BMC Endocr Disord. 2025;25(1):268. doi:10.1186/s12902-025-02065-1

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.