Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Can Reducing Sugary Drinks Prevent Weight Gain in Youth on Antipsychotics?

Hormone Insight visual abstract summarising water delivery and coaching for antipsychotic-related weight gain in youth.
Visual abstract for water delivery and antipsychotic-related weight gain.

Clinical Bottom Line

An RCT finds water delivery plus parental coaching shifts beverage habits but not BMI in youth on antipsychotics. PICO summary and expert commentary for clinicians.

Summary: In Medicaid-insured youth newly started on second-generation antipsychotics, home-delivered water plus parental phone coaching increased water intake and briefly reduced sugary-drink consumption compared with education alone, but produced no significant BMI z-score advantage over six months.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population148 Medicaid-insured youth aged 8–17 recently started on a second-generation antipsychotic.
InterventionBiweekly home delivery of bottled water plus parental phone support from a family navigator.
ComparisonBasic healthy-lifestyle education emphasising water and reduced sugary drinks.
OutcomeGreater water intake at 3 and 6 months (p=0.006; p=0.002) and reduced SSB at 3 months (p=0.004), not sustained. No between-group BMI z-score difference; control rose within-group at 3 months (p=0.029). Neither group crossed the unhealthy-gain threshold.
RCT Nutrients · 2025

Water delivery to curb antipsychotic weight gain

RCT · youth on antipsychotics · 6 months

Trial design
Youth 8-17 on antipsychotics Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED 1:1 Treatment Water + phone coaching n = 74 Control Lifestyle education n = 74 Change in BMI z-score at 6 months
Change from baseline — both arms
BMI z-score Baseline 6 months p=0.919 between groups Treatment Control
BMI z-score, 6 mo
p=0.919
Between-group (NS)
BMI z-score, 3 mo
p=0.908
Between-group (NS)
Water intake, 6 mo
p=0.002
Favours treatment
Unhealthy gain (>0.5%)
Neither
Both groups stable
⬡ Bottom Line

Water delivery plus coaching shifted beverage habits but did not change BMI z-score versus education alone over six months. Neither group crossed the unhealthy-gain threshold.

Expert Commentary

Antipsychotic-related weight gain in children is one of those problems where I badly want a simple, low-risk fix, so I came to this trial hoping the water-and-coaching idea would land. The honest verdict is that it half worked, and the half that failed is the half that matters. Yes, the intervention durably increased water intake and briefly cut sugary drinks, which tells me beverage behaviour is genuinely modifiable in this group. But it did not move BMI z-score, the outcome I actually care about, and that null result is consistent with the broader and slightly deflating literature showing behavioural measures alone make only modest dents in this particular weight gain. I take the reassurance that neither group gained unhealthily, while noting six months is short and the beverage data were parent-reported. Can I use this with my patients? Yes, as one sensible, cheap component of metabolic protection from the day I prescribe, but not as the strategy. The realistic lesson is that preventing this weight gain needs sustained multimodal effort, metabolic monitoring, and sometimes metformin, not hydration alone.

References

Bussell K, Wehring H, dosReis S, et al. Mitigating weight gain side effects by reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in youth newly prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medication. Nutrients. 2025;18(1):24. doi:10.3390/nu18010024

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.