Reviewed clinical summary · Source-linked · Educational use only

Can Placenta-Derived Cells Heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers with Poor Circulation?

Clinical Bottom Line

A phase 2 RCT finds placenta-derived cells improve diabetic foot ulcer closure in the peripheral artery disease subgroup. PICO summary and expert commentary for clinicians.

Summary: In adults with diabetic foot ulcers, intramuscular placenta-derived cells (PDA-002) improved sustained wound closure versus placebo, with the clearest signal (38.5% vs 22.6%) at the lowest dose in the peripheral artery disease subgroup, and no treatment-related serious adverse events.

PICO Summary

ElementDetail
Population159 adults with chronic diabetic foot ulcers, stratified by peripheral artery disease status (phase 2, multicentre).
InterventionIntramuscular human placenta-derived cells (PDA-002) at 3×10⁶, 10×10⁶, or 30×10⁶ cells.
ComparisonPlacebo under matched conditions.
OutcomePrimary endpoint (complete closure within 3 months, sustained 4 weeks) highest at the 3×10⁶ dose in the PAD subgroup (38.5% vs 22.6% placebo). Well tolerated, no treatment-related serious adverse events. Dose response non-monotonic.
RCT Int Wound J · 2025

Placenta-derived cells (PDA-002) for diabetic foot ulcers

RCT · diabetic foot ulcers · PAD subgroup

Trial design
Chronic DFU, PAD subgroup Enrolled & assessed RANDOMISED 1:1:1:1 PDA-002 (3×10⁶) Intramuscular cells Placebo Matched injections Complete closure ≤3 mo, sustained 4 wk
Proportion reaching endpoint
RR ~1.70 % with sustained closure 38.5% PDA-002 (3×10⁶) 22.6% Placebo ARR+15.9 pp
PDA-002 closure
38.5%
3×10⁶, PAD subgroup
Placebo closure
22.6%
PAD subgroup
Absolute gain
+15.9 pp
vs placebo
Serious AEs
None
treatment-related
⬡ Bottom Line

In the peripheral artery disease subgroup, the lowest PDA-002 dose raised sustained wound closure from 22.6% to 38.5% with no treatment-related serious adverse events. The benefit was confined to one subgroup at one dose with a non-monotonic dose response, so the finding is hypothesis-generating only.

Expert Commentary

The ischaemic diabetic foot ulcer is one of the most disheartening things I manage, because standard care so often fails when perfusion is poor, so any pro-angiogenic strategy aimed precisely at that group earns a careful look. The encouraging part is that the signal appeared where the need is greatest, in patients with peripheral artery disease. My verdict, though, is firmly preliminary, because almost everything about the positive result invites caution. The benefit lived in a subgroup at a single dose, and the dose response was non-monotonic, with the lowest dose working best, which is biologically awkward and exactly the pattern that sometimes signals chance rather than a true effect. Follow-up also captured four-week sustained closure but not the outcomes I care most about, recurrence, amputation, and limb salvage. Can I use this with my patients? No, not outside a trial. Standard care, debridement, offloading, infection control, glucose, and vascular assessment, remains the foundation, and nothing here displaces it. I would welcome an adequately powered phase 3 trial in perfusion-limited ulcers before considering this adjunct.

References

Pollak R, Anderson J, Altmanshofer B, et al. Human placenta-derived cells (PDA-002) in diabetic foot ulcer patients with and without peripheral artery disease: a phase 2 multi-center, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Int Wound J. 2025;22(10):e70769. doi:10.1111/iwj.70769

Educational use: Hormone Insight is intended for healthcare professionals and learners. Interpret each summary alongside the primary source, local guidance, and patient-specific clinical judgement.

Subscribe now

Welcome to Hormone Insight. Our mission is to support clinical decision-making with accessible, evidence-based insights from recent studies and trials.

© 2024-2026 Hormone Insight. All rights reserved.