Summary:
In patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR), Limberg flap reconstruction
significantly improved postoperative recovery, reduced wound complications, and enhanced perineal healing compared to primary closure, though it was associated with minor donor site complications.
| PICO | Description |
|---|---|
| Population | Patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer. |
| Intervention | Limberg flap reconstruction for perineal defect closure. |
| Comparison | Primary closure of the perineal defect. |
| Outcome | The Limberg flap significantly reduced wound dehiscence, infection rates, and enhanced overall perineal healing, compared to primary closure. Minor donor site complications were reported but manageable. |
Source: Mina Alvandipour, et al. “Impact of Limberg Flap Reconstruction Following Abdominoperineal Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Read article here.
